Optimal Force

ATTENTION: The track was designed entirely in Newton 2, and the supports are completely handmade.

Thank you everyone for your feedback. It is much appreciated!

From start to finish, this coaster took me just under three weeks to complete, and it turned out to be my favorite creation that I have ever made BY FAR. This one is just packed with thrilling elements the whole way through, wasting no track at all. As with Millennium Force and Intimidator 305, it features a speedy cable lift (this one going at 12 mph) at a 45 degree angle. After climbing 230 feet in the air, it takes an extreme drop at an 80 degree angle reaching a top speed of 80 mph! It also has a total of four over-banked turns, topping out at a banking of 130 degrees, the other three being 110, 115, and another 110 degrees. After its long, curved underground tunnel comes its signature element: The Hanger. All it really is is a zero-g airtime hill, banked at 90 degrees through the whole crest of the hill, creating a very unique feeling of exposure. And it of course, being an Intamin model, has loads of ejector airtime, getting up to -0.9 G's. That's it for now, so enjoy your ride on "Optimal Force"!

Specifications: - Height: 230 ft - Vertical Drop: 221 ft - Top Speed: 80 mph - Max Vertical Angle: 80 degrees - Track Length: 5,974 ft -Max G Force: +4.2 / -0.9 -Trains: 2 / 28 passengers each - Ride Time: Approximately 2 minutes

Ratings

p0wn4g3 5 years ago

8.50

Tech

8.70

Adren

8.20

Orig

Welcome to the exchange! I'm subbed to you on YouTube and i enjoy your rides alot! T- The track was very smooth and had no pumps or bumps. Your supports were done very well and even the fake support ground was not to noticeable. The colors were cool looking and I felt you did very well on making a large, but compact coaster. The drop, over banks, bunny hops, camel backs, were executed perfectly. A- This was a very exciting ride and it kept its pace. The sheer 80 degree drop was amazing and seemed to keep the ride going all the way through. This ride contained tons of airtime moments in the bunny hops and camel backs. O- This fairly original because the ride its self felt different than others I've been on. Overall wonderful coaster and i cant wait to see your other projects!

organicmodelkit 5 years ago

9.50

Tech

9.10

Adren

8.50

Orig

Great job on the coaster. The ride was very smooth and fluid. The first few overbanked turns were particularly good. The supports were excellent. They fit Intamin's design language and were spaced properly. My only criticism is a lack of unique elements or features that differentiate the ride from others. Excellent work overall!

RaptorTC 5 years ago

9.00

Tech

8.50

Adren

8.80

Orig

I really liked this one. I loved the drop and I felt that you did a great job of getting some nice airtime in while keeping the footprint realistic. I wasn't a huge fan of the 90 degree banked airtime hill and I felt like the sequence that began with the tunnel turn and ended with the airtime hill before the trimmed one was just too long of a turn in the same direction. I thought it would never stop turning right. Overall a really nice ride though. Loved the colors.

MJGM 5 years ago

8.30

Tech

8.20

Adren

8.20

Orig

Tech: Not bad, your shaping and smoothness were all in order. Your supports could use a little work, especially the towers holding the first hill; they should be a bit slimmer and certain support structures could have been a bit more complex. Adr: Not bad, I wish you hadn't used the same raised-overbanked-turn-around 3 times (great element but felt sort of repetitive). Other than that air time was great, g's were in check, overall length could have been trimmed a bit. Org: Fairly original layout, great first drop, again the layout did seem repetitive at points and could have been cut down to a better length. Trees were a nice touch, but also a little bit of terrain work would have gone a long way, especially with an out and back coaster like this. I did really like your underground tunnel though, very inventive.

Ling 5 years ago

8.40

Tech

8.50

Adren

9.10

Orig

Personally, while I agree with most of the observations already made, I liked this design quite a bit. I think bits could have been improved here and there, but overall, you have a very well-made, well-composed, and thought out track. Pacing was good, supports were good (mostly), you had a nice mixture of elements, and the ride ended right as it started to lose its excitement factor. My main criticism would have to come from a very realistic park-looking-to-purchase standpoint, in that there's nothing to really sell the ride... its speed is average, height is average, mixture of elements is above average, and there's no fantastic path interaction (that I can fish out). These are the kinds of details that drive a really good creation to be epic. My secondary criticism I level at your tunnel - very clever, but I can't help thinking just making a 3DS tunnel would have been easier, faster, and looked much better. I noticed the wooden supports before even entering the tunnel - that said, I did note that what you chose to use probably would have served its purpose better than any other support style/color available in the Editor. Therefore, I commend you, but this track is just sadly not quite as good as I think it could be. But, I think you definitely have an awesome ride in you, it's just a matter of aligning the right characteristics.

Trackwalker 5 years ago

10.00

Tech

9.80

Adren

9.50

Orig

The G forces were great in every seat of the train. I thought the supports were very well made. I like the way the supports under the first brake run were designed to prevent the track from swaying back and forth as the train slowed down. I also liked your brake settings on that first brake. Technical: Not a thing wrong with this track or its supports. You get an easy 10 here. Adrenaline: What makes this ride so good is the airtime and the pacing of the whole ride and the perfect G forces in the turns. It doesn't get any better than this. Originality: I love the way you designed the tunnel and its terrain. I've never seen anything like it. But when NL-2 comes out, you won't have to go to all that trouble again with the terrain. If this coaster had a custom station I would have given you a 10. You've got a winner here. Thanks for sharing it with us.

thecoasterfreak02 5 years ago

9.00

Tech

9.00

Adren

9.00

Orig

One awesome roller coaster. The coaster was way better then i expected it to be, and it was very impressive. If only this was a real roller coaster... I was more then impressed when I saw the layout of the coaster, and overall, the coaster was impressive, or perhaps even more , and I hope to see more rollercoasters like this or even better soon!

gigacoasterfan 5 years ago

8.80

Tech

9.20

Adren

9.10

Orig

First off, basically all of my opinions are already stated here. In fact, Ling's rate is about what mine would've been. Also, welcome! I subbed to you on Youtube and enjoy your coasters a lot. Tech: First and foremost, it's nice to have a ride on here that isn't made by a Newton n00b or so pumpy that it would kill you. Trackwise, this was really, really good except for one thing, the 90 degree hill. I did not like that at all. It just looks really Newton-y and nothing like Intamin would do. Sorry if I sound harsh, I don't mean like that. What I'm trying to say is that I don't like it. Supports - very well done also. 3ds - minimal to none, and the one support 3d looked fake. Adr: Very thrilling. The first drop was simply epic and each hill delivered just the ridght amount of airtime. Accompanied by the overbanks, it was just wonderful. I305 airtime with MF overbanks. Orr: Very original for a megacoaster. Not much else that I can say.

skullman99 5 years ago

8.50

Tech

9.00

Adren

9.00

Orig

Great job! Technical- The supports were beautiful, and the trackwork was great. None of the Gs got too out of hand. Adrenaline- Definitely a thriller. I entirely disagree with what Ling said. This would be among the only coasters I know of that invert while being over 200 feet tall. That is not a bad thing- this combines awesome speed and drops with the thrill of inversions. I can see any park being happy to have this in their park, if they had the space. And the tunnel adds to that thrill. (I'm not going to criticize you for not using 3ds. I know I absolutely suck at it, so I can't tell off anyone else for not using it.) Originality- Very different, but it seems to capture all the greatest things in a roller coaster- inversions, high and steep drops, awesome airtime, even headchoppers (the tunnel, that is) make this coaster one of the best I've seen. ...and I like the flag. :)

bavarian1523 5 years ago

9.50

Tech

8.90

Adren

9.90

Orig

T:tracks-smooth, tunnels-cool, coaster-good choice, supports-enough, problems- none, all-safe. A:exciting, fun, coaster drop-amazing, not boring, adrenaline-100%. O: I've never seen this coaster before. It is very nice to see people make a coaster that's original. The color of the tracks etc. are nice. Im looking forward to see more improvements though. But all in all I love it!

wjw42 5 years ago

8.00

Tech

8.00

Adren

6.50

Orig

The ride was very well paced and smooth. The supports were overall great and the ride never lost its pace. Personally, it seemed to me fairly similar to a lot of other Newton 2 coasters, but it did have some new elements which I enjoyed. The ride altogether was enjoyable but not the most original I've seen.

wjw42 5 years ago

8.50

Tech

8.80

Adren

7.00

Orig

The ride was very well paced and smooth. The supports were overall great and the ride never lost its pace. Personally, it seemed to me fairly similar to a lot of other Newton 2 coasters, but it did have some new elements which I enjoyed. The ride altogether was enjoyable but not the most original I've seen.

llkl12223 5 years ago

9.30

Tech

8.80

Adren

8.90

Orig

I love the way the ride was designed. large turns and lots of directional changes creates for an amazing ride. Just wish i could figure out how to use newton. very original and was a fantastic ride overall. Great Job.I love the way the ride was designed. large turns and lots of directional changes creates for an amazing ride. Just wish i could figure out how to use newton. very original and was a fantastic ride overall. Great Job.I love the way the ride was designed. large turns and lots of directional changes creates for an amazing ride. Just wish i could figure out how to use newton. very original and was a fantastic ride overall. Great Job.I love the way the ride was designed. large turns and lots of directional changes creates for an amazing ride. Just wish i could figure out how to use newton. very original and was a fantastic ride overall. Great Job.I love the way the ride was designed. large turns and lots of directional changes creates for an amazing ride. Just wish i could figure out how to use newton. very original and was a fantastic ride overall. Great Job.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

efprodutions11 5 years ago

9.50

Tech

10.00

Adren

10.00

Orig

all I have to say is WOOOOOOOOOOOOW !!!!!! T- you tracke was perect and the g's were in every single moment perfect the curves and over-banked curves were also brilliant. A-the spped was perfect not too slow but althoug not too fast it went just fast enough and had the perfect cammel backs and curves O-Very very original coaster and i liked much all the supports and the fake-grass. im looking forwar to your next coaster P.D, chek my coasters !

zaz76 5 years ago

9.00

Tech

7.90

Adren

7.50

Orig

T: Trackwork and supporting were both good. I actually didn't even notice how you made the tunnel until reading the reviews here, so I felt that was well executed and a much better solution than just having the track run through the ground if you don't know how to make a 3d tunnel. A: Honestly didn't find this as exciting as it should be. While the speed was consistently high, it never really 'felt' that fast. I think some more quick changes in direction would have livened things up, as most of the turns were either giant sweeping overbanks or fairly drawn out. Overall it has most of the elements of an exciting ride, it just needs better pacing throughout those elements and a bit more variety. O: While this ride is well constructed, it really didn't have much to stick out from the dozens of other Intamin hyper coasters I've seen. I will commend your creative tunnel making though (might have to try this on my own rides). Overall - pretty good coaster in need of a little identity.

francisco1998 5 years ago

8.90

Tech

9.60

Adren

7.00

Orig

Lo siento, pero solo se hablar en Español T: Al estar hecho en Newton 2 es mucho más sencillo que haciéndolo completamente con el NoLimits, de todas maneras te llevas buena nota, sino fuera así habrías tenido un diezaco como una catedral de grande. A: La adrenalina es genialll!! O: Es una Hyper más, me gusta la parte del tunel, bastante más original que por ejemplo la de Bizarro de SFNEn, eso está muy bien

FearTheWeird 5 years ago

8.50

Tech

10.00

Adren

9.40

Orig

T- It was smooth with no pumps which I always get, but I only use newton on part of my rides. Supports were exceptional, better then mine 99% of the time. The one turn toward the end could of banked less at the top A- I love g-forces and this ride has it. O- This ride is better than most of the rides I been on.

kevlovescoasters 5 years ago

9.00

Tech

8.00

Adren

9.40

Orig

Wow! Amazing! T: I saw nothing really wrong with this section. It was very smooth, the supports were great! I, myself could not have the patience to make a supports made ground,even though it did look obvious that it was wood. You can have alot of potential if you try out .3ds! A: This coaster is full of adrenaline! I loved the first over-banked turn around. I would of liked to see some inversion though. Overall I admire your work, and i cant wait for your future coasters! Have a nice day.

Davidsamrider51 5 years ago

9.00

Tech

9.50

Adren

8.00

Orig

Technically very good....trackwork very smooth no obvious flaws. Really nice pacing throughout.....definitely would be a fun ride in real life. Knocked you down just a little for originality because, frankly, it's not all that original; more like a re-hash of Millenium Force. Still overall very nice job. With a little bit of original theming, would be even better.

ZacharyLamberte 5 years ago

5.00

Tech

7.30

Adren

7.00

Orig

OK, first of all when it comes to coaster structure, I like the layout but the only problem is the duration I prefer longer coaster. Next, for adrenaline it actually has strong Gs (WHOA!!, you might cause blackouts man) . Last, when it comes to originality yes i like it very creative and GOOD JOB. CONGRATS!! haha peace out

themeparkman12 5 years ago

9.00

Tech

8.00

Adren

9.00

Orig

T- The track was very well constructed, as were your supports: I was impressed. I thought you did an excellent job of having a lot of good airtime moments, sweet transitions and good speed. A- The ride kept its pace well, especially through all of the elements. The drop was excellent, the airtime was floaty and the overbanks were sweet. Excellent job. O- Thought you combined the best elements of a lot of different coasters. Great job.

Trackwalker 5 years ago

10.00

Tech

9.40

Adren

8.00

Orig

I thought the track was really well shaped. It looked very professionally done. The hills had lots of air time. I liked the first drop. Looked a lot like Intimidator 305. I liked how you made the tunnel go under the ground. Fortunately we will have real underground tunnels in NL-2. The pacing of the ride was great. That added a lot to the adrenaline. And the transitions from one element to another was very smooth making the ride very enjoyable. Not too much on originality but overall I think this would be a really good ride for any amusement park. Thanks for sharing Optimal Force with us. Like to see more of your rides.

JAKool 5 years ago

8.10

Tech

7.90

Adren

8.40

Orig

I overall liked this ride. I really liked how you made the tunnel, with supports. T- It's smooth, but seems a tad Newtoned. (I wonder why. :P) But the elements flow pretty well. A- It gets a little slow about halfway through the course, and I think you definitely could have kept the pacing. But it's still fast. O- I can see some Millenium Force, and actually a little bit of Expedition GeForce. But still original overall. Nice work with this one!

Bottom_Feeder_13 5 years ago

8.10

Tech

8.60

Adren

8.30

Orig

Technical: I just felt that while the g's on the rider were all fine that the shaping was what I'd politely call questionable. Both of the major airtime hills were just a bit too parabolic to be Intamin but too steep for B&M. The overbanks were my biggest concern, they were all entered straight and the initial banking occurred while the path was still mostly straight and then all the turning was on the way back down from the high point of the turn, as opposed to the symmetry of real Intamin overbanks. I guess what I'm getting at is that the shaping is just a little too Newton controlled and could use a bit of revision. The supports were nice but could have used some flanges and the lift structures were just a bit too wide and looked awkward. Adrenaline: There were some great positives and good airtime but no good interactions with the supports or scenery besides the one tunnel. The elements were all fun but lacked some real flare. Originality: It had the feel of a Bizzaro to it and seemed just a little to bland without anything to really set it apart from the rest of the Intamin hypers out there.

purplechicken86 4 years ago

9.40

Tech

9.90

Adren

10.00

Orig

T: No pumps whatsoever! love it! A: I would probably die because of how amazing the adrenaline is. O: I have never seen anything like this ride before in my life! Expedition GeForce might be original but not nearly as original as this!!! who would have thought of putting boards where the tunnel is!

GerstlCrazy 4 years ago

7.40

Tech

8.70

Adren

8.60

Orig

This had all of the substance of a good project but it could have used a little bit more effort. The shaping wasn't amazing, but it was fun. I like the t-shaped layout. You did well with supports. The track was smooth, and it was exhilarating and original. But the technical standpoints could have seen a little bit more attention.

Drbcoaster 4 years ago

9.00

Tech

6.50

Adren

9.00

Orig

Nice Job! T: There's nothing to complain about here. The track was glass-smooth. The pacing was a tad off - I was anticipating more ejector airtime. Some of the banking felt awkward. A: This could have been a bit better. The pacing over the airtime hills, though it created the desired airtime, it felt slower than it should have been. Perhaps sharper crests versus parabolic ones. The tunnel and the 90-degree banked camel hump were nice touches. O: If this ride were built in real life - it would be a marquee attraction, unlike any Intamin I've ever seen. It almost had hints of B&M in the ride (particularly with the 1st two elements). Overall, a solidly built and unique coaster. Well done!

Gorres Coasters 4 years ago

7.60

Tech

9.50

Adren

8.10

Orig

T - The track was made with newton2, so no jerks or any major pumps. The supports were not completely 'handmade' though, since they are prefab supports. The 'fake tunnel' could have been terraformed though. A - This ride was exciting, pacing was very good. The ejector airtime of about 1g seems to really throw you out of your seat on the camelbacks and bunny hops. O - The use of support beams for a tunnel was clever, but fails to impress. The use of elements from Millennium (Lift, speed) and I305 (airtime) is always unique and great.

skippycoasters 3 years ago

8.90

Tech

9.20

Adren

9.00

Orig

This roller coaster is by far one of my favorites. I love hyper-giga coasters. I could tell that this took a while to make. All the small details added up to something big. CoolioJoe100 did a very good job on this coaster. There is nothing I would change. The height and speed builds up a lot of thrill. The layout of this coaster is amazing. I would totally ride this if it was an actual coaster at a theme park.

SoulCommand 3 years ago

8.40

Tech

8.50

Adren

8.30

Orig

T- Nice ride. Very smooth, not too much G's, Fast, Brakes not to sudden and Turns not to sharp. A- Not very fast but fun. It is more mild then what I am used to put great for a park. A great park needs good HUGE thrill rides and Some medium thrill rides like this. O- I have seen some stuff like this. But it is kind of Original.

TheFerret 3 years ago

10.00

Tech

9.50

Adren

9.00

Orig

T- The ride was extremely smooth, and I didn't see any pumps or jerks (obviously designed in Newton 2). Loved the colors too! A- The ride had good adrenaline, and never really lost it's speed throughout the track. O- It was very original, a few things I haven't seen before. I could see it actually in real life. Great coaster, looking forward for more from you!

Bugga 2 years ago

8.60

Tech

8.60

Adren

8.40

Orig

T: Come progetto possiamo dire che ci siamo abbastanza. NL 2 aiuta anche da questo punto di vista a fare dei tracciati più realistici (devo ancora provare la funzione di attrito personalizzato, dev'essere una cosa piuttosto interessante!) ma un po' di lavoro rimane comunque.Allora, ci potremmo stare se il coaster non fosse così imperfetto. E' una buona cosa che NL 2 abbia le sue buonefunzioni per rendere il tracciato fluido e realistico, ma non sono sempre sufficienti, un po' di lavoro bisogna comunque farlo per rendere il tracciato realistico. Detto questo, il tracciato non è che non sia realistico, ma dovrebbe esserlo un pochetto di più. Per me questo punteggio va bene perchè comuqnue la montagna russa non è che sia proprio realistica al massimo. Ho notato qualche piccola spigolosità – ma non si può nemmeno dire spigolosità perchè non si parla di NL1 – diciamo qualche imperfezione o inclinazione non perfetta, nel cambi di direzione. A: Questo ottovolante, come molti, diventa bello sopratuttto la notte e al tramonto, e al tramonto ti può venire da dire che è quasi più originale di quando l'avevi visto di giorno. Peccato che il frame rate del simulatore la notte cali eccessivamente. E la coa non è molto accettabile ma pazienza.. Non so appieno quanto ti possa aiutare l'editor di NL2, anzi. La cosa simpatica è che quando un tracciato è molto liscio e realistico, anche il punteggio dell'adrenalina tende a salire, e parecchio. Insomma, venendo al coaster, non è nè troppo adrenalinico, ma non è che non lo è per niente. E' una via di mezzo, si poteva fare qualcosa in più. E so bene anche che sono una delle cose più difficili da realizzare purtroppo. Ci vorrebbe sempre un po' di lavoro in più insomma. Nel complesso le basi ci sono, ma in questo caso si poteva prestare un po' più attenzione al realismo generale.Comunque mi piace perchè è strutturata abbastanza bene la successione degli elementi, e non ci sono troppo pezzi vuoti o troppo lenti (anche se qualcosina c'è) tra un elemento e l'altro. Oltretutto l'editor permette di realizzare effetti veramente fighi che possiamo usare su tutti i coaster che costruiamo, il che è veramente positivo. Questa pista con qualche effetto in più potrebbe essere motlo più suggestiva e singolare. Usa anche qualche effetto per rendere il tracciato più unico e particolare, non sarbbe una cattiva idea. O: E' abbastanza originale. Io l'originalità non la so e non la devo giudicare troppo, ma a me sembra ok. Insomma, non voglio nemmeno che uno si inventi chissà che cosa e stravolga completamente le leggi base che sono imposte dalla tipologia cui si fa riferimento. Mi piacerebbe poter scrivere qualcosina in più sull'originalità ma sono un po' a corto di parole, non saprei bene che dire. Ovvio che i limiti nel fare coaster più articolati ed interessanti non finiscono mai con l'editor e gli scenari, oltretutto lo devo ancora provare bene l'editor degli scenari. I cambi di direzione per me sono fondamentali, si dovrebbero realizzare con attenzione.

egorsl 2 years ago

3.20

Tech

3.60

Adren

3.80

Orig

Technique: Bonne synchronisation des trains ainsi que de beaux supports customs. Adrenaline: Une bonne vitesse stable, et beaucoup d'intensité. Originalité: Layout assez complet, mais très court.BT : The track is fairly smooth, nevertheless there's quite a lot of small pumps and on some occasions the lateral G forces where all over the place. AD : I have been riding Rage (original of this standard) a little bit too much on opening day and could remember every small detail of the ride. The barrel Roll provide too much hangtime on the real one and you have the same result here. It's counting in your favour in the accuracy but adrenaline wise I was dreading this portion when I was seated on one of the external left seats. The reason that I went so many time on the ride was because of the length, I was waiting for more and because it's a recreation it would be a paradox to rate it like some other rides which are more enjoyable. OR : As usual I'm looking at the accuracy here, I imagine that the supports are the same as it's a standard and when compared to my set of personal photos you have managed to reproduce the ride at about 80%. Using the Gerstlauer Station is spot on particularly regarding the position of the maintenance track.

nig 2 years ago

10.00

Tech

10.00

Adren

10.00

Orig

GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT GREAT

Score

8.53 / 10

Download
Hyper Coaster
Author: CoolioJoe100
Uploaded: 5 years ago
Ratings: 34
Downloads: 178